Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Better Buy: QQQ vs. VOO

Better Buy: QQQ vs. VOO

  • 0

The Invesco QQQ Trust and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF are both reputable and popular funds that track major market indexes. Many investors hold both funds and face decisions about how to allocate between the two.

There is some overlap between the two ETFs, but they ultimately have different characteristics and historical performance that would make each better suited for different roles in a portfolio. Which is the better buy depends entirely on what an investor is hoping to accomplish.

These ETFs are reputable and similar in several ways

QQQ and VOO are both high-quality funds, and they are similar in many ways. Both have over $100 billion in assets under management, and both have relatively low expense ratios. There is also substantial overlap in holdings, with the two funds sharing Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet among their top 10 largest positions. QQQ and VOO are both highly liquid, with 0.01% average spreads high daily trading volumes.

ETFAssets Under ManagementExpense RatioDistribution YieldP/E RatioPrice-to-Book RatioAverage Daily Volume
Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ)$137 billion0.2%0.57%39.68.2$12.1 billion
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO)$172 billion0.03%1.65%33.93.8$938 million

Data source:, as of 11/17/2020.

Allocation has led to differing performances

The key differences between the two funds are concentration and diversification, which has caused performance to diverge over the years. QQQ tracks the non-financial stocks that make up the NASDAQ-100 Index, whereas VOO is meant to track the S&P 500.

As a result, QQQ is much more heavily exposed to the tech sector and large-cap growth stocks. More than one-third of VOO's assets are allocated to the tech sector; QQQ nearly doubles that. VOO has approximately five times as many holdings, the top five of which comprise less than 20% of the total portfolio. QQQ's top three holdings make up 35% of the total allocation, and the top five are almost 45%.

Image source: Getty Images

A high concentration in tech and growth stocks leads to more volatility and higher upside. Since QQQ's inception in 2010, the fund has returned 536% through a historic, sustained bull market, compared to VOO's 228%. Through a volatile, yet positive, 2020 to date, QQQ has also outpaced Vanguard's flagship S&P ETF by 25 percentage points on the back of its biggest tech holdings.

Image source: YCharts

However, the NASDAQ is prone to larger drawdowns during turbulent markets. Since the market's charge abated in September, VOO has gained 2.4% while QQQ has dropped 2.6%. Even with this recent divergence, the NASDAQ still has richer valuation ratios. That's hardly unexpected or bad, but it can further exacerbate volatility.

Image source: YCharts

So which is a better buy?

Unfortunately, there is some nuance to this answer. Equity ownership is generally meant to provide capital growth in a portfolio, and QQQ has built a resume as the better option for long-term returns. However, the fund's volatility and portfolio concentration make it inappropriate for many investors. Anyone with a low risk tolerance, shorter time horizon, or preference for income investments should prefer VOO. Investors who are not in a position to withstand a downward fluctuation need to think about the pitfalls of low diversification and growth stock investing.

10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 20, 2020

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Teresa Kersten, an employee of LinkedIn, a Microsoft subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Ryan Downie has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A shares), Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool owns shares of Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and recommends the following options: long January 2021 $85 calls on Microsoft, short January 2021 $115 calls on Microsoft, short January 2022 $1940 calls on Amazon, and long January 2022 $1920 calls on Amazon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The business news you need

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

If you’re looking to shed holiday debt, boost your savings or simply manage your money better, a spending freeze can get you on track. Here’s how to embark on (and stick to) a no-spend month.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


Breaking News

News Alert